E-Journal Registration


E-Journal Login


Evaluation of phagocytic function of peripheral neutrophils in bronchial asthma

By September 9, 2019volume2-issue1
Previous Article
Next Article

529 views

Priscilla Johnson et al.: Evaluation of phagocytic function of peripheral neutrophils in bronchial asthma

Original Article

Evaluation of phagocytic function of peripheral neutrophils in bronchial asthma

Priscilla Johnson1 , Sheela Ravinder.S2 , Late Geetha Rani3

1Department of Physiology, SMC, 2 Sri Ramachandra Medical College & Research Institute, SRIHER, Chennai – 600116
2Department of Physiology, SMC, 2 Sri Ramachandra Medical College & Research Institute, SRIHER, Chennai – 600116
3Department of Physiology, SMC, 2 Sri Ramachandra Medical College & Research Institute, SRIHER, Chennai – 600116

ABSTRACT:

Background: Bronchial asthma is a serious inflammatory disorder affecting a major group of children and adults, especially in environmentally vulnerable population. The management of asthma requires exploring the possible cause, understanding plausible mechanisms, alleviating the allergens although permanent cure is not assured. Hence, this study was conducted to evaluate the phagocytic function, an indicator of the inflammatory response in asthmatic subjects. Materials & Methods: This study was carried out among 30 asthmatics and 30 normal healthy adults in the outpatient clinic of a tertiary care hospital. Spirometric measurements were used to diagnose and grade asthma. Blood samples were taken to estimate the total count and differential counts. Candida uptake and NBT reduction were considered as markers of phagocytic activity in neutrophils. Results: In asthma subjects, lowered phagocytic index (16.23 ± 5.43 vs 41.87 ± 4.78) and NBT reduction (8.67 ± 2.25 vs 29.7 ± 4.57) were observed indicating phagocytic dysfunction. However, the phagocytic dysfunction of neutrophils was not found to be related to severity of the disease. Conclusion: This study in asthmatics has revealed that there is dysfunction of phagocytic indices in asthmatics when compared with healthy volunteers. Smoking, positive history of atopy and use of biomass fuel had a reasonable impact on deterioration of phagocytic function in asthmatics. However, severity of the disease did not show any correlation with the phagocytic function.
Keywords: Asthma, Neutrophils, Phagocytosis, Spirometry, Smoking

Corresponding Author: Dr. Priscilla Johnson, Department of Physiology, Sri Ramachandra Medical College & Research Institute, SRIHER, Chennai – 600116, priscillajohnson@sriramachandra.edu.in

How to cite this article: Priscilla Johnson, Sheela Ravinder.S and Late Geetha Rani, Evaluation of phagocytic function of peripheral neutrophils in bronchial asthma,  JAPT 2019:2(1):6-11

INTRODUCTION

Globally, nearly 300 million individuals are affected by bronchial asthma which poses a serious threat to the health of the individual and thus asthma seems to be one of the major cause of chronic morbidity and mortality throughout the world.[1] Evidence based studies show that the prevalence of asthma has increased considerably over the past 20 years, especially in children.

According to World Health Organization, an estimated 15 million Disability Adjusted Life Years (DALYs) are lost every year because of asthma, which in turn is attributed to1% – 18% of the overall global disease burden.[2] Asthma is causing an increase in socio-economic burden due to health care cost, absence from work leading to productivity loss. It also reduces the active participation of the affected individual in family life.

Access this article online

Quick Response Code: Website:
www.aptchest.com

Globally, nearly 300 million individuals are affected by bronchial asthma which poses a serious threat to the health of the individual and thus asthma seems to be one of the major cause of chronic morbidity and mortality throughout the world.[1] Evidence based studies show that the prevalence of asthma has increased considerably over the past 20 years, especially in children.

According to World Health Organization, an estimated 15 million Disability Adjusted Life Years (DALYs) are lost every year because of asthma, which in turn is attributed to1% – 18% of the overall global disease burden.[2] Asthma is causing an increase in socio-economic burden due to health care cost, absence from work leading to productivity loss. It also reduces the active participation of the affected individual in family life.

AIM & OBJECTIVE

To study the reasons for treatment interruption among patients presenting with history of treatment interruption at GHTM .

MATERIALS/METHODS

An observational study done at GHTM over the period of 6 months on patients with a previous history of ATT interruption. The reasons for treatment interruption were collected using a standardised questionnaire and the results were statistically analysed .

RESULTS

401 patients presented with history of treatment interruption during this period. Most of these patients were in the productive age group of 20 – 60 years (82.5%). 72 % were smokers. 82 % were alcoholic. 12 % of patients were not aware of the treatment duration needed for cure. 16 % had other comorbidities with Tuberculosis including DM, HIV, CAD, pancreatitis.10 % of patients had interrupted treatment more than one time. Most of patients interrupted after 2 months of ATT.

How to cite this article: Sridhar.R, Vinodkumar.V, Kumar.S, A study on factors leading to treatment interruption among TB patients at GHTM, JAPT 2018; 1:3-6

Major reasons identified for treatment interruption were a feeling of well being during the course of treatment (41 %), alcoholism (11%), migration (10%), family issues (5%) , drug related adverse events (17%),lack of knowledge of the disease and treatment duration required (4%). The drug related adverse events noted included gastrointestinal, joint pains and skin rashes.

CONCLUSION

Our study gave us some insights into the reasons for interrupting treatment and serves as a guidance to focus on pretreatment counselling with the goal of reducing treatment interruption thereby reducing the emergence of drug resistance TB.

INTRODUCTION

Drug resistant TB has been known from the time the anti TB drugs were first introduced for the treatment of TB. Currently WHO estimated the incidence of Rifampicin resistance and MDR _TB in India to be around 147000.(1). The first national anti TB drug resistance survey for 2014 -16 (NDRS) was concluded recently and results published in 2017(2). As per this document among patients previously treated for Tuberculosis any drug resistance was detected in 36.2 % of patients, MDR TB was detected in 11.62 % of patients and XDR TB was detected in 0.91 % of previously treated patientsas compared to 22.5% , 2.8% and 2.3 % respectively among patients never exposed to ATT,. (2).

One reason cited for the development of drug resistance is an inadequate or poorly administered regimen.(1). The problem of drug resistance cannot be completely eliminated by systems of detection and treatment of drug resistance. More important is to prevent the emergence of drug resistant bacilli by taking ATT adequately in the first instance.

It is often noted in clinical practice that still many patients present to the pulmonologist with history of interruption of anti Tuberculous treatment. Understanding the reasons for interrupting treatment while on Anti Tuberculous medications and undertaking measures to prevent such treatment interruption will pave a way for ensuring that the patients will complete their treatment adequately and the transmission of Tuberculosis can be interrupted in the community.

This study was undertaken at GHTM, Tambaram sanatorium to study the reasons for treatment interruption among TB patients at GHTM, Tambaram.

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES

To study the reasons for treatment interruption among patients presenting with history of treatment interruption at GHTM .

METHODOLOGY

This study was an observational study done at GHTM, Tambaram sanatorium over a period of 6 months from January to June 2018. Among the patients with Tuberculosis, patients with history of interruption of Anti Tuberculous treatment were taken up for the study. Using a standard questionnaire data was collected including demographic profile, social behaviour, educational background, reasons for interruption of treatment and the adverse reactions of drugs. The results were tabulated and analysed statistically using a SPSS software.

RESULTS

401 patients presented with history treatment interruption during this period

Table 1: Age distribution of patients in the treatment interruption cohort.

Age of patients Numbers n= 401
less than 20 years 4 (1%)
21 – 40 105(26%)
41 – 60 226(57%)
61 66(16%)

Most of these patients were in the productive age group of 20 – 60 years(83%).

Table 2: Sex distribution of patients in treatment interruption cohort

Sex Number
Male 369 (92%)
Female 32(8%)

Most of these patients were in the productive age group of 20 – 60 years(83%).

Table 3: Educational status of the patients

Educational qualification Numbers
Never attended school 138(34%)
Upto 5 th standard 72(18%)
6 th to 8 th standard 103(26%)
9 th to 10 th standard 46(11%)
11 th and 12 th standard 13(3%)
Degree 27(7%)
Post graduates 2(<1%)

Many of the patients who discontinued treatment were found to be uneducated (34%)

Table 4: Smoking and alcohol usage in this group

Smokers
Male 288
Female 0
Non Smokers
Male 82
Female 31
Alcoholic
Male 327
Female 0
Non Alcoholic
Male 43
Female 31

72 % were smokers and 82 % were alcoholic.

Table 5: Awareness of duration of ATT intake in this group

Awareness About Duration of Att Intake No. of Patients
Aware 353 (88%)
Unaware 48 (12%)

.12 % of patients were not aware of the treatment duration needed for cure.
16 % had other comorbidities with Tuberculosis including DM, HIV, CAD, pancreatitis

Table 6: Duration of treatment before interrupting treatment

Att Interruption After No. of Patients
less than 1 Month 16 (3%)
1 Month 48 (12%)
2 Months 71 (18%)
3 Months 102 (26%)
4 Months 81 (20%)
5 Months 77 (19%)
6 Months 5 (1%)
7 Months 1 (0.2%)

Most of patients interrupted after 2 months of ATT67 %)

Major reasons identified for treatment interruption were a feeling of well being during the course of treatment (41 %), alcoholism (11%), migration (10%) , family issues (5%) , drug related adverse events (17%),lack of knowledge of the disease and treatment duration required (4%).
The drug related adverse events noted included gastrointestinal (10%), joint pains(5%) and skin rashes(2%).

DISCUSSION

GHTM, Tambaram sanatorium is a tertiary referral centre for patients with all forms of Tuberculosis and serves as a nodal centre for the treatment of drug resistant Tuberculosis.

On a daily basis we encounter many patients who attend GHTM with history of discontinuation of ATT. This poses a challenge in achieving the goal of END TB strategy as these patients continue to spread the disease in the community and also pose a problem of likelihood of developing drug resistance. Strong systems to detect, successfully treat and ensure long term disease free status of TB patients are required to prevent emergence of resistance.(1). Basic diagnostic and treatment services in conjunction with ensuring that patients complete the treatment without interruption should receive priority if we are to achieve the dream of TB free India by 2025.

We searched the literature using Pubmed and Google scholar on the reasons for ATT interruption and found several studies from Africa and rest of the world including south East Asia.(3,4,5,6,) and also from North India(7,8,9). Literature on this topic from the Southern part of the state was sparingly low.Regional and social factors like migration, social beliefs, educational factors play a role in treatment interruption.

The studies cited (3-9) focussed on male sex, younger age of the patient, duration of treatment, alcohol abuse, low income, HIV positive status as reasons for treatment interruption while on Anti TB treatment. To our knowledge the issues of educational qualification and awareness of treatment duration and strict adherence to treatment have not been addressed so far.

In concurrence with the earlier studies, our study too revealed that male sex had a higher probability of treatment interruption than the females. Our study is also consistent with study done by Basa S(7) which showed a higher incidence of treatment interruption in patients in the productive age group of 20- 60 years.

We studied the educational qualification of these patients and found that many of them were uneducated. We also observed that as the educational qualification progresses the proportion of treatment interrupters reduces considerably. This highlights the importance of the need for health and hygiene education in patients who are less well educated and likely to interrupt treatment.

Alcohol abuse has been documented as a risk factor for treatment interruption in several studies(3,4,6,7). Never smoking was identified as a protective factor from treatment interruption in study by Cherkaoui I et al(6). In our study group we found that 72 % were smokers and 82 % were alcohol users which is consistent with other studies.

Awareness of treatment duration and need for uninterrupted treatment was lacking in 12% of this study group. This shows the need to focus on pretreatment counseling and reinforcing the need for an uninterrupted treatment. Smoking cessation and alcohol deaddication measures will play a larger role in this cause.

Comorbidities were another reason for treatment interruption in the study group reasons being increased pill burden and drug interactions while using multiple medications for several diseases. In our study we found most patients defaulting after 2 months of treatment unlike study by Kigozhi et al where interruption was more in the first two months of treatment. Most of these were due to a feeling of well being after the initial course of ATT.

CONCLUSION

If the goal of End TB strategy to eliminate Tuberculosis by 2025 is to be met it is imperative that every patient started on treatment should complete treatment without interruption so as to reduce the transmission of bacilli in the community and also to reduce the emergence of drug resistant bacilli. Our study gave us some insights into the reasons for interrupting treatment and serves as a guidance to focus on pretreatment counselling for better adherence to the regimen.

REFERENCES

1. Guidelines on programmatic management of drug resistant Tuberculosis in India 2017
2. Report on National TB drug resistance survey 2014 -16 published in 2017; Department of health and family welfare, Government of India.
3. Factors influencing treatment default among Tuberculosis patients in a high burden province of South Africa. Kigozhi et al. International journal of infectious diseases. 54(2017).95 -102
4. Factors associated with default from treatment among tuberculosis patients in nairobi province,Kenya: A case control study. Muture et al. BMC Public Health 2011, 11:696
5. Determinants ofDefault from Tuberculosis Treatment among Patientswith Drug-Susceptible Tuberculosis in Karachi,Pakistan: A Mixed Methods StudyChida N, Ansari
Z, Hussain H, JaswalM,Symes S, Khan AJ, et al. (2015). PLoS ONE 10(11):e0142384. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0142384
6. Treatment Default amongst Patients with Tuberculosis in Urban Morocco: Predictingand Explaining Default and Post-Default Sputum Smear and Drug Susceptibility Results.Cherkaoui I, Sabouni R, Ghali I, Kizub D, Billioux AC, et al. (2014)PLoS ONE 9(4): e93574. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0093574
7. Study on default and its factors associated among Tuberculosis patients treated under DOTS in Mayurbhanj District, Odisha. Basa S, Venkatesh S. J Health Res Rev 2015;2:25-8

SITE LAUNCH

SITE LAUNCH